Skip to content

Enterprise deploymentCustomer-hosted or fully managed.Contact salesView pricing

+Solutions · Software and Engineering

Coding agents with guardrails, not handcuffs.

Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and your own agents keep shipping. Destructive commands, secret reads and unreviewed deploys stop at a hook.

+What it protects

  • Source code and repository access
  • Credential and secret handling
  • Command, cloud, and CI execution

+Where we are

Engineering-agent controls and OWASP LLM mappings are available in preview.

Preview

+The risk

What goes wrong without a decision layer

The outcomes this solution is built to prevent.

Risk 01

Credential or source code exfiltration

Risk 02

Undeclared destructive command execution

Risk 03

Autonomy drift across repository, cloud, or CI boundaries

+In practice

Two requests, two decisions

Illustrative examples of how the layer decides. Real decisions depend on your policy and context.

Coding agent

BLOCK

“rm -rf ./infra && terraform apply -auto-approve”

Destructive command followed by an unreviewed infrastructure change.

Coding agent

PASS

“Run the unit tests for the billing package.”

Scoped, read-mostly command in the working tree.

+The controls

How Intertrace handles it

+Controls applied

  • Secret and source-code data boundaries
  • Command and tool authorization with execution permits
  • Intent and autonomy drift detection

+What we test

  • Secret export and destructive command denial
  • Declared engineering workflow preservation
  • Repository and cloud boundary enforcement

+Start from

Policy packs

Deterministic starting policy you can tune per agent. A pack is an input to your policy, not proof of readiness.

DevOps / engineering - constrained actions

strict

Agentic security pack for engineering agents: constrain shell/CI/cloud tools; block secret exfil and destructive commands.

Internal RAG

standard

Tighter argument caps; monitor mode by default for tool-result inspection in dashboard.

+For reviewers

Evidence mapped to your frameworks

OWASP LLM Top 10

Evidence mapped to

LLM02 · LLM06 · LLM08

The mapping does not prove operational effectiveness.

SOC 2

Aligned controls

CC6 · CC8

Aligned engineering controls are not an attestation.

Framework references are mappings or aligned-control notes. They are not independent assessments, attestations, certifications, or government authorizations unless separate scoped evidence says so.

+Honest scope

What you still own

  • Repository, CI, command, and cloud resource semantics require customer-specific binding before production claims.
  • Deployment: Real repository, CI, and cloud resources are least-privilege bound before production use

+Other industries

+ The AI watching your AI

Map this to your software and engineering agents.

Bring one workflow. We'll show you what the layer decides on it, and what evidence it leaves.